Intellectuals Fail India

800×600

Normal
0

false
false
false

EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”;}

 

 

Poverty has been cursed to be mother of all problems. While that may or may not be so, affluence itself cannot be termed as a panacea for all ills afflicting the society. In fact, sometimes affluence leads to more serious problems. Newspapers abound with stories of affluent kids going astray, breaking and subverting laws and going scot-free. While poor people may be forced to commit crimes out of sheer necessity to survive, the rich indulge in them for pleasure. When affluence partners with power, we can face worst type of anarchy. The problem is more acute in developing countries like India where legal system is not adequate. And where, simultaneously, the intelligentsia, the intellectuals have failed to create public opinion, strong enough to rein the ill effects of abundance. As a result powerful people — Politically powerful, financially powerful, or with sheer muscle power— seem to get away with anything.

 

 There are many instances when powerful people have taken the law in their “mouth”, by which I mean they spoke what they should not have. But I’ll share only two such instances which occurred sometime back. Both are                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

 instances of affluence leading to irresponsible behavior and both have escaped the attention of most people, even the omnipotent and we-know-all obsessed electronic media. Sadly, they always raise a crescendo over non issues and often ignore the issues that pose real threat to the Indian society/polity and social fabric. The omission is more glaring when the cause of trouble comes from the powerful lobby of politicians and cash rich industrialists. And, as always, in the present cases also our intellectuals failed to notice and react to the latent threat in seemingly innocuous incidents/statements.

 

One such incident is the statement of one of the most highly rated industrialists – Anil Ambani, advocating Narendra Modi as the Prime Minister of India. The occasion was the inauguration of the Nano plant somewhere in Gujarat. Even Mr. Rattan Tata, otherwise very suave and well meaning individual, appeared to be giving a tacit approval to the proposal. Why was this desire raised publicly? Surely Ambani would have his own reasons! But what has been rankling the mind of all well meaning people is that a handful of industrialists are only concerned with their bottom lines and the facilities provided to them for increasing their wealth, sometimes in the name of national interests. But they seem to be least bothered about the way this target is achieved. They are worried only about the ends and not the means and that is dangerous. Unfortunately, the tendency to equate national interests with creation of wealth and economic progress is gaining ground in India. Indian intellectuals have failed to put the things in proper perspective.

 

Certainly these gentlemen are not new to Gujarat and Modi. In all probability they are aware of the post Godhra anti Muslim carnage in Gujarat. Such highly placed individuals must also be aware of the role played by the Gujarat Govt.,  the Gujarat police and the complicity of Mr. Modi during that black chapter of modern Indian history; and still these gentlemen want the same individual at the whelm of affairs of the nation! A nation that boasts of being the oldest civilization and the biggest democracy of the world! A nation that proclaims Gandhi to be the father of the nation. We all know that for Gandhi, means were always as important, if not more, as the ends.

 

Some will claim that in a democracy, everyone has a right to have his own views. But let me caution that such a right cannot be absolute. As a story after the French revolution tells us “Your freedom ends where my nose begins”. When a common social cause is in danger, when ancient values of a nation are threatened, when humanity itself becomes an endangered species, personal welfare of a few individuals cannot be guaranteed.

 

The second incident also pertains to a similar, self-styled protagonist of commercial wisdom, who used to think that he is beyond law and whatever he says, should be obeyed by all. He also had vast financial resources at his disposal. In addition he had the support of the cricket crazy masses. For him a petty, commercial sports tournament was more important than the most auspicious festival of democracy viz., the general election, yes I am referring to the previous general elections. First, this gentleman had the audacity of conveying to the Govt. of India that the dates for the IPL tournament were seemingly unalterable. And with mass support, and media created frenzy, at one time he threatened the holding of general elections also. He got support from none other than the highly “effective” Modi who rated the government’s failure to provide security as having dented the national pride beyond redemption. One may ask the cricketing buffoon, sorry tycoon, as to what was so sacrosanct about the dates of that purely commercial and private sports event? Why for him the game of lampoons was more important than most

important event of a democratic polity? Thanks to the steadfast stand of the soft spoken home minister his bluff was called. People of the country demonstrated rare wisdom in not making an issue of the needless controversy. Some people might justify his stand by quoting astronomical Rs. 1800 crore bypassing Indian economy. But fortunately, that was not good enough to befool the Indian masses which proved that they are discerning enough to weed grain from the chafe.

 

The danger that I see in Mr. Ambani’s statement and Lalit Modi’s stand lies in the possibility (even though very remote) of these people, with vast financial resources at their command, actually using their financial clout to manipulate the democratic process                                                                                                to accomplish their ambitions. That possibility is too scaring to even think of. That is why                                                                    I feel that the incidents should have received more attention, and evoked stronger protests among the intelligentsia. However, as far as I can think, not even a whimper was heard! Unfortunately, in the cacophony for industrial development and vested interests of the politicians to be on the right side of the financial power centers, any political party also did not take notice of the dangerous suggestion. Surely, fertile ground for fascist ideologies to grow in India has been prepared. Let me share two of the fourteen characteristics of fascism as identified by Dr. Lawrence Britt: Powerful and continuing nationalism; and protection of corporate power. With RSS ideology in the background, Modi like managers at whelm of affairs and Ambani like self centered financial tycoons around, the danger of India turning fascist is nearer than it seems. Let’s beware!

 

But the question that still remains unanswered is: why the intelligentsia failed to react to these proposals? In his lecture “Intellectuals and Society: Time to Redefine their Role and Responsibility” delivered by the vice President, Hamid Ansari, at the IIAS Shimla on April 2009 he has emphasized the need for the intellectuals to be more vocal. He quotes Vaclav Havel who feels “the intellectual should constantly disturb, should bear witness to the miseries of the world, should be provocative by being independent, should rebel against all hidden and open pressures of manipulation, should be the chief doubter of system of power and its’ incantations.” But Indian intellectuals have left much to be desired in this regard. They appear to be in perpetual hibernation. They seem too self centered, sometimes too scared to raise their voice against powers that be, and the majority opinion. Could it be for some future rewards? Edward Said’s observation in this regard seems very pertinent. He said, “Nothing in my view is more reprehensible than those habits of mind in the intellectual that induce avoidance, that characteristic turning away from a difficult and principled position which you know to be the right one, but which you decide not to take. You do not want to appear too political, you are afraid of seeming controversial; you need the approval of a boss or an authority figure; you want to keep a reputation for being balanced, objective, moderate; your hope is to be asked back, to consult, to be on a board or prestigious committee, and to remain within a responsible mainstream; some day you hope to get an honorary degree, a big prize, perhaps even an ambassadorship. For an intellectual these habits of mind are corrupting par excellence. If anything can denature, neutralize, and finally kill a passionate intellectual life, it is the internalization of such habits.”

 

To me, it seems that Indian intellectuals have crossed the limit.

 

Jaswant Singh Saini

478    D, BRS Nagar Ludhiana—141001

       Mobile: 9888514670

 

 

Advertisements

THE PRESIDENT AND THE TRUTH!

 

A few decades back, one quality that was highly appreciated and sought after was the ability to “call a spade a spade”. Anyone who possessed that quality was looked at with high respect, and people in responsible positions were required to possess that “quality”. But that no more seems to be true. After the advent of much touted liberalization and free market, the portals of free thought seem to be shrinking fast. This much sought after quality is now looked down upon as an infectious disease which needs be vaccinated against! So much so that even the people who have attained everything possible in life and have actually nothing to lose by speaking the truth also make earnest efforts to be “politically correct” lest they earn the wrath of concerned people! Every day we see so many people making patently false statements and showering accolades on the people who should actually be castigated for their anti-social/self serving actions. One recent such incident that stumped me was the observations made by the First Citizen of the nation at the “National Seminar for the Welfare of Lawyers” organized by the Delhi Bar Council. Funny nation, in the first place, where the most lucrative professionals also need their “welfare” being discussed like this!

 

The President of the country made a statement that “the nation needs to reset its moral compass”, an interesting but highly diluted statement at that.  The question that actually needs to be asked of the collective national conscience is whether, even after seventy years independence, the country does have any moral compass?  If at all there is one, it needs not be reset, but totally overhauled. It seemed that the First Citizen is entirely out of touch with the ground reality about the legal profession and those practicing it. How could he, otherwise make a sweeping judgmental statement that “lawyers had played major role in ensuring the basic rights and furthering the cause of democracy.” Alas, It were true! Any citizen who has had the occasion to deal with this enlightened class of society, has an entirely a different story to share. It is the lawyers (barring a minuscule and honorable minority) who have been instrumental in basic rights being denied to majority of the people – especially the have-nots, down-trodden and marginalized sections of the society. It is not without a reason that they are one of the professions from whom a common man wants to be saved/protected! The truth is exactly the reverse of what the President wants us to believe.

 

Another statement he made, forced laughter! He said that he had “no hesitation in stating that the Indian legal system as a whole had lived up to the faith and confidence of the people”. Has it, really? Thirty year on and not even a single conviction of the perpetrators of the worst post-partition holocaust in the national capital – under the very nose of the national government! None of the powerful judicial wings had the guts to even question the most obnoxious statement made by the Prime Minister of the nation that added fuel to the fire and legitimized the massacre of  innocent people. The entire judicial system in fact took a cue and ensured that no justice was done! No, Mr. President you are too shortsighted and suffer from selective amnesia, a national disease in such cases, if you still decide to eulogize the legal system that failed to deliver justice to the lakhs of hapless people. Not only this, this efficient system has persistently failed to protect the basic human rights of the people who are forced to fight to protect their hearths and livelihood.  Barring a few bright instances, this system  has actually damaged the cause of democracy to a point of almost no return by mostly keeping mum on violations of the law and the constitution by the mighty and powerful! As an example one can see the news (on the same day)  of Supreme Court clearing the vitriolic young Varun Gandhi of the charges of delivering hate speeches for want of (what else) evidence.

 

And finally the President made another statement: “Bar deserved unequivocal recognition for stellar achievements” Yes- it does….for its achievement in the form of millions of pending case; for delay of decades in deciding petty theft case and ensuring that innocent people languish in jails for periods much larger than the maximum punishment for those crimes and for protecting the mighty and powerful from the long arm of the law! It is keeping these BRIGHT SPOTS of the legal/judicial system that forced Surjit Patar, the Gyanpeeth and Sahit Academy award winner to lament and write:

                                Waiting for justice,

People have transformed into trees;

                                Ask them to go home

                                Till when they will keep standing here?

Fortunately, the President could not hide the pathetic situation in the corridors of law for too long and also shared that the women lawyers have moved a petition in the Supreme Court to enforce its own verdict for providing congenial work atmosphere in the law/court rooms. A classic example of “nearer to church and farther from God”! All is not well Mr. President but it needs guts to call a spade a spade- particularly when the spades happen to be so powerful. I wish you showed those guts Mr. President!

NEW FORM OF TERRORISM

 
 

As per news headlines 1984 riot victims stopped trains in Punjab yesterday. Our all powerful police under the most efficient DGP failed to do an iota to relieve the commuters from this new form of terrorism. It has become a fashion these days to seek easy targets in the poor railway passengers who have planned their urgent journeys months ahead. And no government worth its salt has ever tried to protect the law abiding citizens from this highhandedness who have nothing to do with the acquittal of any Bastard anywhere. A question needs to asked of the organizers as to why they are harassing old and young, needy, sick alike and for what purpose. Let me assure you that their curses would take justice still away from you. ….I am worried at total lackadaisical attitude of all stake holders including the intelligentsia  and the other organs of the civil society. IF THERE IS ANY SIN, IT IS HARASSING THE INNOCENTS FOR NO FAULT OF THEIRS! WILL ANY BODY RAISE HIS VOICE AGAINST THIS TERRORISM?